THE AUTHOR OF TORAH---->6:-(THE CRITICS HISTORY)

"Gaddes" did not attack the auther of the "TORAH" like "Ilgen",or,"J.G Echorn" in his book "Einleitung"1780-1783 ,or,"Austrc", but he was famous, that he attracts"J.S Voter",and "DeWette" to argue with his thoughts,perhaps because he was a Roman Catholic and his authorized personality was a priest. At 1802-1805 "J.S Voter" wrote his book"Commentar uber den pentateuch,3 Vol.s and argued "Gaddes" proclaiming that[ from his point of view] there were 30 documents which have been used in the cultural media of the old civilizations. "DeWette"published his book "Beitrage aur Einleitung in das Alts Testament"at 1807 after "Voter", depending on a comparison studies, between what was recorded in the "TORAH", as legal subjects, and what was recorded in the different old civilizations, which were at "Moses"times, and thus he reached to a conclusion, that the writer of the "TORAH",have collected it, after "Moses" times It was strange situation, from our point of view, if a man finds some different subjects, using some different expressions[it may be different sure, because it deals with different situations], to suggest that, it refers to a different documents, as Voter did,that he also specify them, as 30 references, and called them documents !!! And also it is strange to find, some similarerities between the legal rules, during "Moses" times,and the other civilizations, to proclaim that a writer after "Moses",have written them, due to that past collected references ,If we know ,dears, that the Right,and the Religion Bases,also theLegal rules were older enough more than that times,"For the Invesable things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made. "Romans 1.20 .And because God have given the human the mind, and the logic, which is the base of the legal bases, it was not up normal, if we find in the old civilizations some similarities, with the legal rules of the "TORAH",added to that it was a similarities, in the circumstances ,and reasons for establishing these rules ,therefore it was normal to find some similarities in the concluded rules.But, Are there any near similarity which urge us to prefere his opinion ?I am sure not , that is what we will see after 10 essays. " DeWette"'s opinion in concern of "TORAH"was begun when he was writing his researches to be qualified to the Doctorate degree, at 1805 and refers to the suggestion of "Jerom" 1400 years ago,who suspected in the story of "Josiah"622 BC .that the " Deuteronomy " was the book which written during his rign,and divided the origins of the "TORAH" according to his assumption, to three origins,J,E,D {D is a sign for" Deuteronomy" while"Ilgen"called it E2} But "Jerom"'s suspects, in concern of the date of writing the "Deuteronomy" were not right, because if we read the story of "Joshiah"in 2 Kings 22,23 and in Chronicles 34,35 we will not find any sign, about any new book's writing ,but in contrust,we will find that, they have found an old book,The theme that, that book was "Deutoronomy",is not accepted till now by all the scholars . What about the movement of the criticism during the middle of the nineteenth cetury that is what we shall see later. Rev.Joseph