ASCIENTIFIC REACTION ( Biblical - Archeological - Literal - Historical 14 )

                The problem which the form criticism have created ,to themselves, was the question .Who wrote the "TORAH" ?,because they denied the "Mosaic Authorship" .                                                                                One of their followers, his name was "The Late Ivan Engnell",have established "Uppsala School",in order to escape from this difficult question, he suggested an existence of two groups ,during the exile times, he called them the "P" group ,and the "D" group .                                                                                                                            The "P" group, kept in their memory the first four books :- Genesis,Exodus, Leviticus and Numbers .                                                                                                                                           While the second group ,kept in their memory four other books, they were :- Deuteronomy, Joshua, Judges , Samuel [ first and second] .                                                                                                                                                     The eight books were collected, from the total memory ,of those two groups ???                                                                                                         The original source of their memory, was the prophet himself . BUT they did not solve the problem, which the form criticism have created to themselves, he imagined that he solved it ,by suggesting that the source were the prophet himself, but he did not mention, What was the words of the prophet, and what they have added after him ,and how did they all agreed about the differences, and if the two groups were belonging to the  grandfathers ,who were students in the school of the prophet, how did the grandfathers of the second group lived, in the times of "Joshua " ,and still alive to the end of the book of "Samuel",at the days of "David",to collect in their memory the contents of the four books .                                                                               So, he did not solve the problem, but he added some problems, without any logical reasons.                               The school of " Uppsala" ,were not the only wrong attitude, which faced the "Wellhausen"'s theory, accompanied by the school of the form criticism, and the Scandinavian school , there were other schools, like the school of the" Traditio-Historical " ,or, the historical traditional attitude . The followers of "Edhard Nielson" who have established this school ,wrote his book "Old Tradition",1954 ,which depended upon the study of the Old Hebraic People's psychology, and with the using of the Old Eastern literature , added to that some kind of imaginations ,We can not describe it as a real Scientific thinking, they were as he, who searched what was in the mind of the King "Tut" ,while he was eating his last meal !!!                                                                                                                                                   WHY they denied the old writing for the "TORAH" ?? , WHY they tried to think about how the Hebrew people collected the "TORAH" later ??, by the using of their memories !!                                                                                                         To answer about this question ,we have one definite answer ,IT was because, they were under the effects of the thoughts ,of "Wellhausen" himself who suggested that, the Hebrew language ,were not a written language ,before the exile ,this false idea led them to some closed roads .What was the archeological discoveries said, after their time ,to answer them, if they were following the themes of "Wellhausen", and attacked him at the same time .                                                                                                                                                The origin of the "Hebrew" language ,which was the "Akadean" language, were still common as a diplomatic language, before the twentieth century ,to the fifteen century BC, as we knew from the letters of "Tell -el-Amarna", the Hebrew language itself,were formed from the twentieth century BC, but we have also some Hebraic  writings ,up to the fortieth century BC, in spite of it was not developed, as the other "Holographic" language , "W.J.Martin" recorded that in his book ,"Dead Sea Scroll of Isaiah " p18,at1954 , it was before "Moses"times .                                                                                                                                         The " Texts of Nuzi " and the "Texts of Mary" , proved the validity trust in the contents of the "TORAH" , and let us see later         Rev. Joseph