THE AUTHOR OF THE TORAH-------------------> 10:- ( THE CRITICS HISTORY)

    (1)      The "Evolution Theory " of "Darwin" was the real motive of "Wellhausen", He did not understood, according to the philosophy of that theory, how did the "Tabernacle"of "Moses" was found ,without any previous example before it ?.The worship in "Solomon's Temple" compared with the neighboring nation's "Temples" ,may be comprehended as a new type of worship, practiced in a modern great building,more greater, than the "Temples" of the nations ,and "Wellhausen "could comprehend that development in shape, by using the philosophy of "Darwin", but it was impossible to use it ,to explain the "Tabernacle".                                                                                                                                    (2)The verses about "David" and the ignorant people, who have not a places to worship in [ the Bible expressed the meaning ,that they have not a possible. places, which means that the place of worship, may be very far from their country,therefore it became over than their abilities].we must now that "David" himself have chosen to be a king, by God ,was anointed by "Samuel",who was not a priest ,he was a "Nazarite" see  1Samuel 1.22 the law of the Nazarite was in the book of Number 6.1-21, but he played the act of the priest ,,because the priest was not faithful,  1Samuel 2.27 so God called him instead of the priest ,about this period we found the quotations of "Wellhausen",which he have chosen, in spite of , this quotations did not reflect the general state, in the Jewish community, during all the stages of its developing .."Wellhausen"therefore has a great academic fault in his proof, which makes the validity of  his conclusion's =ZERO                                                             At the period which "Wellhausen" quoted his passage as an example "David" have known that it was a "Tabernacle". see 2Samuel 7.2 "that the king said unto "Nathan" the prophet , See now ,I dewelleth in an house of cedar but The ark of God dwelleth within curtains".                                                                                                                                                                                                                    (3)"Wellhausen" himself told us that the centric warship, began after the withdrawal of "Sennacherib" from "Samaria", and the destruction of the second "Temple"of "Samaria" .in spite of he confessed that, the second temple of "Samaria" was built ,after the reign of "Solomon", during the reign of his son "Rehoboam", therefore he have fallen in a contrast, that it was a great confession that the centric worship were known before his assumption at least during the reign of "Solomon" through his indirect confession.                                                                                                                                                     (4) At last ,if the "TORAH" as he have suggested ,were written after the books of the prophets,Why did he quote from it, to prove that the worship at the "Patriarchal age"[the age from "Adam" to" Moses"] ,were free, and every one of those fathers, have chosen the place of His worship freely.  His theory suggested that, the history of its writing was more than 800 after the death of "Moses"therefore it assumptive that the history inside it is wrong, not only that, but he also allow clearly ,that the history is wrong.Did he find some faults in his assumptions, that he rejected it ,and accept our evaluation to the TORAH ? it is a strange matter.WE will complete our evidences ,after 6 essays let us be tolerant and wait "Wellhahausen" next time.                              Rev. Joseph