Sunday, August 16, 2009
A SCIENTIFIC REACTION ( Biblical - Archeological - Literal - Historical 4 )
Another example of the differences between the critics ,were the opinions of "Astruc"which compared by the opinions of "Ilgin". "Asruc"said that, the first eleven chapters of the book of Genesis, belonged to the origin"J" !!! BUT,"Ilgin" said that they belonged to the origin "E"!!! To know what is "J" and what is "E" in their conception, we must explain that "J" is the first letter ,of the most sacred name of God "Jehova", "YAHOAH", this name is most sacred that, the Jewish used to read it "ADONAI",which means The Lord ,because they glorify the name of "YAHOAH" ,and have prevented their tongues, to pronounce it ,even to read its vowels, because it is belonges to the most sacred one. But the letter "E" ,is the first letter of the name "ELOHEEM", it is in a plural form ,which used to describe, the person of God as an individual ,as a creator , as a source of the whole universe. If the reason of their guesses, in concern of the origins ,was to find really an origin ,which denoted God as "YAOAH" ,and distinguish it from the origin ,which denoted God as "ELOHEEM". !!!! then WHY "ASTRUC" said that the first eleventh chapter of Genesis ,related to the origin "J" ? the logical ANSWER IS, because he observed that it related to the origin[from his point of view] that proclaiming "YAHOAH" as a truly God, The same question about the opinion of "Ilgin".WHY "ILGEN" said that the same text belonged to the origin "E" ? ,the logical ANSWER ALSO IS because he observed that the same text related to the origin[from his point of view] that proclaiming "ELOHEEM"as a truly God . Their different opinions, logically would comprehended, if we found a discussion, or conflict between the two principals, inside the eleventh chapters, by finding a kind of comparison, between the double attitudes . If it was the fact,then we can give every one of them ,a pardon ,that in his point of view, he saw that the "J" group, or the "E"group, is the real source, and even if it was the fact, we can not respect their thoughts ,as a scientific type of thinking,BUT IT WOULD BE a personal views . IN FACT any reader to the eleventh chapters of the book of Genesis ,does not observe that conflict ,or disagreement ,because every name, were used in its correct place ,to reflect something about God,While "ELOHEEM" reflects God's being as a subject of adoration,"YAHOAH" reflects His function towards His people( for example see Genesis 3.1 in Hebrew ASHERthat ,ASHAH made by YAHOAH the Lord ELOHEEM God " It was really a big problem for them both,Because their purposes were to prove some human origins,and if the text was related to one origin, their purposes would not released. Because this unique source, would comprehended ,and interpreted, to be belong to God,who have inspired his word to "Moses" . There are seventeen chapters in genesis, and in Exodus, emptied from the name of "YAHOAH", in spite of that ,some critics added them to the origin "J" of "YAHOAH". Also there are fifteen chapters ,emptied from the name "ELOHEEM", while some critics added them, to the origin "E" of "ELOHEEM" . It is clear therefore, that their opinions are not a scientific opinions ,it were just personal views of some people ,who had never any trust, or belief in the inspiration in general, and in the Holy Bible as a holy book . and followed Rev. Joseph
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment