A SCIENTIFIC REACTION ( Biblical - Archeological - Literal - Historical 11 )

             When "Carlstadt "criticized the "TORAH", he assured that the story of the death of "Moses", at the end of the Deuteronomy , was his major proof ,that "Moses" was not its writer ,.he was in fact, effected by the opinions of "Ibn Ezra" ,but when he studied the contents of the "TORAH", he commented on the unity of its style, and its inside evidence in Ex 17.14,24.4-8,34.27,Nu 33.1,2,Deuteronomy 31.9about the writer of the "TORAH", he said that, it was impossible for any person, to speak on behave of "Moses" ,with using the Personal pronoun of "Moses",and produced the books of the "TORAH",which had a unity style , it is clear to us now, that some of those critics ,attacked the "TORAH" before giving a sufficient chance for the deep  thinking .                                                                                                                                                                                            But "Wellhausen"had a special privacy, .he observed the history of the Israelite people ,along many ages ,and commented on the times, when they were practicing the polytheism, after the times of "Moses",and their worshiping tn many places, after the "Tabernacle" ,because of that, he suggested that the story of "Moses",and his thoughts and deeds,were composed in a later ages ,after his existence , or , he imagined that the folkloric descriptions, were attached to his personality ,and united with the books of the "TORAH" ,along many stages {we can give him a scientific pardon, if he have shown us some scientific samples ,of the "TORAH", along the ages,but,as we know, he did not have had any sample, or any eye witness, who saw it ,or,any confidential source ,which have described what he have said}.                                                                                                                                                                               He could not understood that, the people were in Egypt with"Moses", and the paganism were their original sin, which they could not leave it ,at the moment of the exodus ,in spite of the oracles of "Moses",the "TORAH" itself described that disobedience of the people, also, when they entered the promised lands ,they found themselves between the nations, who believed in the paganism ,and the polytheism ,many hundreds of years , the prophet "Solomon" played an important part, in concentrating on the place of the worshiping, but he could not prevent the people, to be loyal to the one God,because the relation between God and his people, ,in fact,is a secret personal relationship ,BUT through these ages of the disobedience, there were some of faithful people, increased ,or decreased ,according to the political ,economical,social,and the real states of the Israelite community.                                                                                                                 The state of the Israelite people in the past, looked like the states of the people, who belonged to any religion, at any time , the faithfuls always only a percentage amount,less or more the percentage of the unfaithful persons .                                                                                                                                                         And if we added that "Wellhausen" himself, referred to the "TORAH" to prove his suggestion , the Scientific base is, To prove your themes ,it must established on the bases of the confidential sources , if the "TORAH" was confidential, then his theory was false,but if it was not, Where is his confidential sources  ? Where were these confidential origins ?.                                                                                                                                                                                                               Therefor the results or the conclusions of that theory ,did not have any validity, it was unscientific theory .   and follow,                                                                                                                              Rev. Joseph