A SCIENTIFIC REACTION ( Biblical - Archeological -Literal - Historical "3" )

             "H.Hubfeld"'s purpose was to divide the "TORAH" into pieces,what we have possessed as a heritage of our ancestors, he did not accepted it, I mean that, he wanted the division  as a purpose, in itself,in spite of he denied that ,he said about himself, that did not divide a records of a story, which was united together, but the "TORAH"[ due to his accuses] has a many kinds of stories,with different styles of recording, some of it has a statistical type, but the others has a folkloric type, therefore the statistical was from the origin "E1", but the folkloric was from the origin "E2" !!!!                                                                                                                 Our study to the historian books, who wrote the events as an eye witness, shows us ,that it contains of numbers and dates,but it is also consists of events and social reactions, no one can say that, that eye wittiness has two origins, to compose his history .                                                                                                                                         I agreed with "E.T Yong"that those people have dealt with the "Holy Bible" ,worst than what any critic deals, with any other book of literature.                                                                                                                                       Who read the book of "w.F.Albright" "History of Archeological and Christian Humanism",will find that there are many Archeological researches, about the traditions and the habits ,of the people, who were the habitants of this area, in the old times, which agreed typically, with what the "TORAH" has recorded,the archeologists proved that, the archeological investigations ,are like a mirror which reflected the facts of the events ,which was recorded in the "TORAH",. Yes, that is because, it is the mirror of God, which reflects the truth,the divine truth                                                                                                                                                Until a recent time ,the scientists of the language, were similar to what "wellhausen" has said ,that the "Hebrew" language were not known as a writing language, before a recent time, after the exile,If it was true we have the faith that, the older system of recording their news ,were kept by God ,to handle it to us because it is his word, BUT thanks to God,The archeological discoveries showed us, some Hebrew writings, near the time of the patriarchal ages, before "Moses", but before"Levi" ,and before "Jacob "or his father "Isac"..          In spite of the changes, which have occurs in the languages of the eastern people, around the "Hebrews" ,the "Hebrew"  language have not changed, not in its grammar nor in letters.                                                      The 350 letters of Tel el Amarna, in Egypt, testified that this is the truth ,There were some letters, which have been written by the Pharaoh's workers in Palestine, to the Pharaoh, to till him some news ,or problems,during the EIGHTEENTH dynasty at the sixteenth century BC some of these letters were written by "Hebrew" ,it was discovered by a peasant woman ,and now they are kept in the "Berlin Museum"  .                                                                                                                          And if we refer to the book of "Gressman" at 1700 we will find that there were also, some "Hebrew" writings during the "Hyksus" period, which were during the patriarchal ages.(see" A Horientalisch Bilder Zum Alten Testament"CCLIX,1926                          and follow Rev. Joseph