A SCIETIFIC REACTION ( Biblical - Archeological - Literal - Historical "2" )

 The Biblical,Archeological,Literal,[ in concern of the old languages studies ],with the historical accompanied events,which accompanied the facts of the "Holy Bible", specially[due to our present research] which was at the times of the "TORAH" ,these sciences provided us with some comments ,on the theories of the critics.                 We observed from our studies to the accuses,the claims,and the suggested theories of the critics ,about the "TORAH" , that there were many differences between there opinions, both  their assumptions and their results or conclusions ,which I called it suggestions .                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      In the real scientific methods and bases ,we recognized how the new theory  corrects or removes the old theories conclusions ,or results ,or canons, IF the subject of the new one, was the same subject of the old theory, BECAUSE OF some modern data OR some faults during practicing the theory ,as a result of another elements, which were not in the mind of the old scientist, but it was not the matter in concern of the "TORAH" . For example:- if you ask in the dark ages of the critics,or during ,or after the renaissance ,if you chose any year and ask about, What was the numbers of the suggested origins of the "TORAH" . You will find then many opinions, Are they one,two ,three, four, twelve,seventeen,or more some one said they were fourteen ???? were they E1 or E2 or P or J or D or all of them together????                                                                                             Did they were in "Moses" times,or after his life directly, or at the time of the kings ,or during the exile ,or after it??You will find at every time ,some different answers,Therefore their deferent results, proves that all of  their assumptions ,were wrong ,added to that two important observation,                                                         THE FIRST is:-no one of them succeeded in putting before us, an example for a real old document,contained his suggested assumptions ,or even some of it  .                                                                                                                                                                              THE SECOND observation is :-  No one of them, could maintain the religious beliefs ,of the nation as a whole, before his suggested date for the writing,or adding, No one of them, gave us a proof ,or description ,which we can depend upon it, as a precise proof ,or description for the people's belief ,before his genius suggestion .                                                                                                                                                                          To explain my thought let us take for example the time of "H.Hubfeld"1853 who said that the "TORAH" comes from three origins "J","E1","E2", added to them "D",the oldest origin was "E1" ,At his time was "K.H.Graf" who said the" P "was the oldest ,At their time "H.Ewald" said that E was one combined origin. But if ask, Where is "E" ? Have you an old book contained "E"  only ?or contained "P" only ?or" D" only?? You will find no answer!!!! . So, before they added "D", or" P" or "E "What was the believes of the all the people ?, Do not please, give me a verse,which describes someone , or an ignorant person ,or some group of the people, or even one of the great persons, because you then ,will fall in a dangerous scientific mistake, because your sample, is not a scientific sample, it makes your results shows a wrong conclusion, established on a wrong reasons   and followed Rev. Joseph